The Lobbyist Justice
  • Kennedy joined a San Francisco law firm, but he returned to
    Sacramento in 1963, when his father died, to take over his father's
    practice. Despite his inexperience, many of his father's clients
    remained with the firm while Kennedy honed his legal and political
    skills. He socialized with politicians, entertained clients with lavish
    parties, and made large donations to state politicians on his own and
    his clients' behalf. During this period he met Ed Meese, a fellow
    lobbyist, and they became close friends. Meese later went to work for
    California Governor Ronald Reagan, and in 1973 he brought Kennedy on
    board to help draft a ballot initiative to cut taxes and government
    spending. Kennedy impressed Reagan, who recommended him to President
    Gerald Ford for a vacancy on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.


    http://www.pbs.org/wnet/supremecourt/future/robes_kennedy.html

    Is the fact that the author of Citizens United is a former lobbyist well known by those who report and discuss the opinion?  Personally, unlike let's say comments about Ginsburg's career promoting women's rights or even Thomas' life story with his grandfather or something, I basically never see it mentioned.  That seems a bit off.
  • Couldn't question the legitimacy of the decider.  That might call the legitimacy of the court itself into question.  Couldn't have that.  People might even realize that political results have something to do with the court's results.
  • Well, I wouldn't go as far as to make him illegitimate though I'm sure some here will. It just seems -- like Ginsburg's past advocacy  -- relevant enough to be notable. 
  • I do see some qualitative distinction between a career spent promoting universal human rights and one spent shilling for corporations, but he's certainly no less legitimate than most of the people populating the elected branches of government.

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

In this Discussion